Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
"Civil Liberties"
  • Civil Liberties
2
Campus Speech / Free Speech
  • Campuses a free speech battleground
  • Campus codes at many colleges prohibit speech that might offend minority groups
3
Free Speech
    • Civil libertarians fight such codes - favor free speech in a free society
    • Courts generally side with the civil libertarians
4
Civil Liberties in the Constitution
  • Framers – wanted society based on civil liberty (freedom)
  • Civil liberties - protect individuals from government interference in areas like speech / religion
  • Civil Liberties come from God / Civil Rights come from government



5
Constitutional Liberties
  • Original Constitution - protected a few liberties from national government / states decide for themselves
  • To Safeguard Against tyranny - National government restricted from attacks on individual liberties
6
A Liberty or a Right
  • Civil Liberties – Government must be restrained / “Natural Rights” (Pursuit of Happiness stuff)
  • Civil Rights – Individual / Constitutional rights / More absolute (14th Amendment stuff)


7
“What If?”
  • Prayer in School
    (Don’t let the camel get his nose under flap of the tent)
  • PTL Club
  • Dr. Gene Scott
  • Snake Handling
  • Poison
  • Invasive Procedures


8
More “What If” Stuff?
  • What is Obscenity?
    Justice Potter Stewart (1958- 1981)
  • Photos of Wife
  • Man in Utah
  • Maplethorp
  • Clothing / Bumper-stickers
  • 1989 – Gregory Lee Johnson
9
“Not Protected” Speech
  • Oliver Wendel Holmes – Clear and present danger test (will it cause substantial danger?)
  • Today – “Actionable Words” (must incite to action)
10
Defamation Speech
  • Libel – Written speech that harms
  • Slander – Spoken speech that harms
  • Private Person / Public Person
    Must be Untrue / Show Special Damages
  • Private Content / Public Content
    Also “Actual Malice” or “Reckless Disregard”
11
School Prayer
  • Since the 1960s - Courts rule against prayer in public schools
      • Religious groups can meet in public schools
      • Students can pray on their own or in unofficial study groups
12
Freedom of Press
  • New York Times
  • Hustler v. Jerry Falwell
  • Niatross Mayo Sissler v. Plainsville Courier
13
Freedom of Press Cont.
  • 1971 - Pentagon Papers
    New York Times - Neil Sheehan’s first story on the Pentagon Papers (30 Years of involvement in Vietnam)
  • No Prior Restraint
  • Cameras in Court
  • Right to Fair Trial v. Free Press (murder)


14
Crucial Freedoms
      • Writ of habeas corpus except for public safety due to rebellion or invasion
      • No bills of attainder
      • No ex post facto laws
15
Ratifying the Constitution

  • Bill of Rights necessary as a condition for ratifying the Constitution
16
Evolving Constitution
    • Most freedoms not specifically mentioned in Constitution
    • Many rights / liberties established by judges
    • Many rights evolved as culture / values changed
17
Rights and Liberties (1800s)
  • Protection of liberty in the original Constitution referred to individual’s right to own private property
  • Importance of property was reinforced by a century of judicial interpretation
18
Marshall Court (1801-1835)
  • Bill of Rights did not restrain the states (Protected states from Fed. Govenrment)
  • Property and the Taney (Tauney) Court (1836-1864)
    • (Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
19
Property Rights
after Civil War

    • 14th Amendment guaranteed  rights of newly freed slaves
    • Due process clause of 14th Amendment - no state may “deprive a person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” (takings clause)
20
19th Century
Rights of Property
    • Expanded with  emerging industrial society
    • Little attention to increasing protection of civil liberties in Fed. courts
    • Little progress made in rights of women / African-Americans
21
Twentieth-Century Changes
  • 1900s - property rights, civil rights, and political liberties frequently expanded
    in Fed. courts
      • Changing of the economy / culture
      • New political groups / movements
22
Nationalizing the Bill of Rights
  • Before 1900s – Bill of Rights protected only States from Federal intrusion (individual liberties not protected)
  • Bill of Rights evolved to mean - Individuals would be protected from the States” by the Federal Government
23
Selective Incorporation
    • Framers worried about intrusions by the national government
    • Congress unwittingly changed Bill of Rights with 14th Amendment (States no longer protected from Fed. Govt.)
    • 14th Amendment - states can not violate rights of ex-slaves (Constitution now interpreted to protect individuals)
    • 1960s - Court nationalized much more of Bill of Rights
24
Freedom of Speech – 1st Area for “Nationalization”
  • Gitlow v. New York, 1925 – Gitlow convicted of breaking Criminal Anarchy Law (advocated violent overthrow of govt. - but no action) /  New York bound by 1st Amendment (NY law unconstitutional because no action)
  • Free Speech - a lot more than just speech
  • Few limitations
25
Freedom of the Press
  • New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) - A major expansion of freedom of the press / protected newspapers against trivial or incidental errors when reporting on public persons



26
Offensive Mass Media
  • Obscenity not protected by the 1st  Amendment (art and obscenity difficult to define)
  • Feminist want “obscenity” to include speech degrading to women
  • Concern today - sexually offensive material available to minors (and others) on Internet
27
Free Exercise of Religion
  • 1st Amendment includes two provisions concerning religion
      • Make no laws that prohibit free exercise of religion
      • Make no laws respecting an establishment of religion
28
Until Recently
Exercise of Religion Unlimited
    • Flag salute cases (public school children to salute flag / recite Pledge of Allegiance)
    • Nationalized free exercise of religion clause (government must not interfere with religious beliefs)
29
Separation of Church and State
    • Doctrine of the “establishment clause” (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.)
    • Federal anti-polygamy law? (Y)
      • (polyamory?)
    • States can deny benefits if one refuses to work on Sat. because of religion (N)
    • Military can ban religious headwear (Y)


30
Unstated Rights
  • The freedom to be left alone in our private lives (right to privacy) not mentioned in Constitution
  • Debate continues over constitutionally protected right to privacy
31
Right of Privacy
  • General Warrants / Writs of Assistance
    (Greyhound / Profile searches / coerced searches)
  • Random Drug Testing
  • Exclusionary Rule – Evidence cannot be used / reasonable cause
  • Wire Taps / Cell Phones / e-mail
32
Rights of the Accused
    • 1950s and 1960s - Warren Court
    • Expanded federal authority
    • Restricted state authority
    • Expanded accused right’s
    • Rising crime / Enforcement faced legal technicalities / increased protections for criminals

33
Concern About Crime Reshaped Constitutional Interpretation
    • Warren Court (1953-1969)
    • expanded due process at expense of efficient law enforcement
    • Burger Court (1969-1986)
    • expanded most due process decisions of Warren
    • Rehnquist Court (1986-present) reversed a few due process protections, watered down others
34
Rights of the Accused
  • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    • Mapp v. Ohio – exclusionary rule
35
Due Process
  • 5th Amendment – Double Jeopardy / Self-incrimination
  • 1966 - Miranda v. Arizona
    Miranda warnings ($8.00 stolen / Police arrest Miranda / Miranda confessed to theft and also kidnapping and rape of 18 yr old female (confession not admissible)
36
More Due Process
  • 6th Amendment
  • Speedy trial
    Assistance of counsel
    Confrontation of hostile witnesses
    Right to obtain witnesses
37
Still More Due Process
  • 7th Amendment
    Right to trial by jury
  • 8th Amendment
    Cruel / Unusual punishment
  • 1976 – Death sentences set aside
    Now a two step process
38
The Right to Counsel
  • 1932 - Powell v. Alabama –  states could decide if representation required (only in capital cases)
  • 1942 - Betts v. Brady – representation (at govt. expense) only required in capital cases if case complex, accused incompetent
  • 1963 - Gideon v. Wainwright – representation required even in non- capital cases, complex or not