|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Campuses a free speech battleground
- Campus codes at many colleges prohibit speech that might offend
minority groups
|
|
3
|
- Civil libertarians fight such codes - favor free speech in a free
society
- Courts generally side with the civil libertarians
|
|
4
|
- Framers – wanted society based on civil liberty (freedom)
- Civil liberties - protect individuals from government interference in
areas like speech / religion
- Civil Liberties come from God / Civil Rights come from government
|
|
5
|
- Original Constitution - protected a few liberties from national
government / states decide for themselves
- To Safeguard Against tyranny - National government restricted from
attacks on individual liberties
|
|
6
|
- Civil Liberties – Government must be restrained / “Natural Rights”
(Pursuit of Happiness stuff)
- Civil Rights – Individual / Constitutional rights / More absolute (14th
Amendment stuff)
|
|
7
|
- Prayer in School
(Don’t let the camel get his nose under flap of the tent)
- PTL Club
- Dr. Gene Scott
- Snake Handling
- Poison
- Invasive Procedures
|
|
8
|
- What is Obscenity?
Justice Potter Stewart (1958- 1981)
- Photos of Wife
- Man in Utah
- Maplethorp
- Clothing / Bumper-stickers
- 1989 – Gregory Lee Johnson
|
|
9
|
- Oliver Wendel Holmes – Clear and present danger test (will it cause
substantial danger?)
- Today – “Actionable Words” (must incite to action)
|
|
10
|
- Libel – Written speech that harms
- Slander – Spoken speech that harms
- Private Person / Public Person
Must be Untrue / Show Special Damages
- Private Content / Public Content
Also “Actual Malice” or “Reckless Disregard”
|
|
11
|
- Since the 1960s - Courts rule against prayer in public schools
- Religious groups can meet in public schools
- Students can pray on their own or in unofficial study groups
|
|
12
|
- New York Times
- Hustler v. Jerry Falwell
- Niatross Mayo Sissler v. Plainsville Courier
|
|
13
|
- 1971 - Pentagon Papers
New York Times - Neil Sheehan’s first story on the Pentagon
Papers (30 Years of involvement in Vietnam)
- No Prior Restraint
- Cameras in Court
- Right to Fair Trial v. Free Press (murder)
|
|
14
|
- Writ of habeas corpus except for public safety due to rebellion or
invasion
- No bills of attainder
- No ex post facto laws
|
|
15
|
- Bill of Rights necessary as a condition for ratifying the Constitution
|
|
16
|
- Most freedoms not specifically mentioned in Constitution
- Many rights / liberties established by judges
- Many rights evolved as culture / values changed
|
|
17
|
- Protection of liberty in the original Constitution referred to
individual’s right to own private property
- Importance of property was reinforced by a century of judicial
interpretation
|
|
18
|
- Bill of Rights did not restrain the states (Protected states from Fed.
Govenrment)
- Property and the Taney (Tauney) Court (1836-1864)
- (Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
|
|
19
|
- 14th Amendment guaranteed
rights of newly freed slaves
- Due process clause of 14th Amendment - no state may
“deprive a person of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law” (takings clause)
|
|
20
|
- Expanded with emerging
industrial society
- Little attention to increasing protection of civil liberties in Fed.
courts
- Little progress made in rights of women / African-Americans
|
|
21
|
- 1900s - property rights, civil rights, and political liberties
frequently expanded
in Fed. courts
- Changing of the economy / culture
- New political groups / movements
|
|
22
|
- Before 1900s – Bill of Rights protected only States from Federal
intrusion (individual liberties not protected)
- Bill of Rights evolved to mean - Individuals would be protected from
the States” by the Federal Government
|
|
23
|
- Framers worried about intrusions by the national government
- Congress unwittingly changed Bill of Rights with 14th
Amendment (States no longer protected from Fed. Govt.)
- 14th Amendment - states can not violate rights of ex-slaves
(Constitution now interpreted to protect individuals)
- 1960s - Court nationalized much more of Bill of Rights
|
|
24
|
- Gitlow v. New York, 1925 – Gitlow convicted of breaking Criminal
Anarchy Law (advocated violent overthrow of govt. - but no action)
/ New York bound by 1st
Amendment (NY law unconstitutional because no action)
- Free Speech - a lot more than just speech
- Few limitations
|
|
25
|
- New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) - A major expansion of freedom of the
press / protected newspapers against trivial or incidental errors when
reporting on public persons
|
|
26
|
- Obscenity not protected by the 1st Amendment (art and obscenity difficult
to define)
- Feminist want “obscenity” to include speech degrading to women
- Concern today - sexually offensive material available to minors (and
others) on Internet
|
|
27
|
- 1st Amendment includes two provisions concerning religion
- Make no laws that prohibit free exercise of religion
- Make no laws respecting an establishment of religion
|
|
28
|
- Flag salute cases (public school children to salute flag / recite Pledge
of Allegiance)
- Nationalized free exercise of religion clause (government must not
interfere with religious beliefs)
|
|
29
|
- Doctrine of the “establishment clause” (Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof.)
- Federal anti-polygamy law? (Y)
- States can deny benefits if one refuses to work on Sat. because of
religion (N)
- Military can ban religious headwear (Y)
|
|
30
|
- The freedom to be left alone in our private lives (right to privacy) not
mentioned in Constitution
- Debate continues over constitutionally protected right to privacy
|
|
31
|
- General Warrants / Writs of Assistance
(Greyhound / Profile searches / coerced searches)
- Random Drug Testing
- Exclusionary Rule – Evidence cannot be used / reasonable cause
- Wire Taps / Cell Phones / e-mail
|
|
32
|
- 1950s and 1960s - Warren Court
- Expanded federal authority
- Restricted state authority
- Expanded accused right’s
- Rising crime / Enforcement faced legal technicalities / increased
protections for criminals
|
|
33
|
- Warren Court (1953-1969)
- expanded due process at expense of efficient law enforcement
- Burger Court (1969-1986)
- expanded most due process decisions of Warren
- Rehnquist Court (1986-present) reversed a few due process
protections, watered down others
|
|
34
|
- Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
- Mapp v. Ohio – exclusionary rule
|
|
35
|
- 5th Amendment – Double Jeopardy / Self-incrimination
- 1966 - Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda warnings ($8.00 stolen / Police arrest Miranda /
Miranda confessed to theft and also kidnapping and rape of 18 yr old
female (confession not admissible)
|
|
36
|
- 6th Amendment
- Speedy trial
Assistance of counsel
Confrontation of hostile witnesses
Right to obtain witnesses
|
|
37
|
- 7th Amendment
Right to trial by jury
- 8th Amendment
Cruel / Unusual punishment
- 1976 – Death sentences set aside
Now a two step process
|
|
38
|
- 1932 - Powell v. Alabama – states
could decide if representation required (only in capital cases)
- 1942 - Betts v. Brady – representation (at govt. expense) only
required in capital cases if case complex, accused incompetent
- 1963 - Gideon v. Wainwright – representation required even in
non- capital cases, complex or not
|